The statement questions the credibility of investigations related to significant public events and calls for transparency regarding allegations of misconduct. It expresses skepticism about official narratives and demands accountability.
- The statement challenges official narratives, which could be seen as promoting accountability but may also contribute to public distrust without evidence. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It demands the release of names related to serious allegations, which could violate privacy and dignity if not handled responsibly. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism of investigative bodies, which can be constructive if aimed at accountability but lacks evidence to support claims. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.