Reposted by Speaker Mike Johnson
The statement claims significant fraud in Obamacare subsidies, citing mismatched Social Security numbers and fake applicants. It criticizes Congress for wanting to expand subsidies without safeguards. The accompanying image from a GAO report suggests issues with identity proofing and documentation in the enrollment process.
- The statement raises concerns about potential fraud, which could be seen as aiming to prevent harm by highlighting issues in the system. However, the tone is alarmist, which might not constructively address the problem. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the accusatory tone could contribute to a negative perception of subsidy recipients.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing on criticism rather than solutions or constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement criticizes Congress without engaging in constructive dialogue or offering solutions, which could be seen as a personal attack on policymakers. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.