Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement and conversation address concerns about potential fraud in the Obamacare subsidy system, highlighting issues with identity verification and the approval of fictitious applicants. The tone is critical, aiming to draw attention to perceived flaws in the system and the actions of Congress.
- The statement aims to highlight a significant issue, potentially contributing to public awareness and debate, but the language used ('disgrace') may be seen as inflammatory.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or hate speech, but it could be seen as lacking in respect for the complexity of the issue. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of Congress but does not provide a constructive dialogue or solutions. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.