Randy Barnett
@RandyEBarnett
·
23d
The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the interpretation of the 14th Amendment concerning birthright citizenship, a significant public issue. It questions the common understanding of the phrase 'subject to the jurisdiction' and suggests that it was intended to limit eligibility for citizenship, which is a matter of legal and civic importance.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on a legal interpretation, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement aims to clarify a legal point, which can promote understanding, though it does not explicitly foster empathy or compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a legal debate without personal attacks, adhering to constructive dialogue principles. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to discuss a legal interpretation responsibly, contributing to civic dialogue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.