Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement engages with a public issue by questioning the actions of the FBI and the Biden Administration regarding the investigation of the J6 pipe bomber. It raises concerns about the handling of evidence and suggests a lack of transparency or accountability, which are significant public concerns.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies criticism of the FBI and the administration, which is a legitimate part of public discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity as it does not engage in personal attacks or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does raise awareness about a public issue.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the FBI and the administration but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to question government actions, which can be seen as an attempt to hold authorities accountable, potentially contributing to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by questioning government actions and using a media platform to disseminate information responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.