Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement reports on a public event involving a political figure and protesters, touching on sensitive topics like immigration and historical comparisons. The tone is factual but includes emotionally charged language from the protesters.
- The statement itself does not directly cause harm, but the quoted language from protesters could be considered harmful or inflammatory. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy by not revealing unnecessary personal details, but the protesters' language could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it highlights conflict without context or resolution. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks, but the protesters' language could be seen as an ad hominem attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.