Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement comments on a legal case and references conspiracy theories, suggesting skepticism towards such theories. It engages with public discourse by addressing the credibility of evidence in a legal context.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies criticism of conspiracy theories, which could be seen as dismissive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes skepticism towards conspiracy theories, which could encourage critical thinking, but lacks empathy towards those who might believe in them.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but could be seen as dismissive of opposing views. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.