The statement engages in public discourse by questioning the decision to blur faces in images related to a sensitive issue involving public figures and potential survivors of abuse. It raises concerns about transparency and the implications of such disclosures.
- The statement is cautious and does not directly harm individuals, but it questions the actions of a political group, which could indirectly cause harm if not handled sensitively.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy by acknowledging the potential need for identity protection, but it also questions the decision, which could pressure for disclosure. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement seeks understanding by asking for clarification, promoting a dialogue about the reasons behind the decision. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism by questioning the actions without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.