The statement engages in a discussion about religious extremism and political affiliations, which are public issues. The tone is defensive and attempts to clarify a distinction between extremists and a broader political group.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not directly harm but uses charged language like 'extremists' and 'pervert the faith,' which could be seen as harmful to some.
ย [-1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the use of 'extremists' could be seen as disrespectful to some.
ย [-1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement attempts to promote understanding by distinguishing between extremists and a broader group, but it lacks empathy and compassion in its language.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in personal attacks but does not foster constructive dialogue either.