Reposted by Christopher C. Cuomo
The statement criticizes Megyn Kelly for not publicly opposing Candace Owens, suggesting hypocrisy and questioning her motives. It uses a confrontational tone, implying that Kelly's reasons are insufficient and that her eventual stance will lack credibility.
- The statement uses a confrontational tone, which may not promote understanding or empathy, potentially violating this principle. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement questions Kelly's motives and implies hypocrisy, which could be seen as disrespectful, potentially violating this principle. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism but does so in a confrontational manner, which may not foster constructive dialogue, potentially violating this principle. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.