Reposted by Christopher C. Cuomo
The statement highlights a connection between chants at a protest and a violent attack, suggesting that the slogans are not merely abstract but have real-world implications. The tone is serious and implies a warning about the potential consequences of such rhetoric.
- The statement could be seen as aiming to prevent harm by warning about the implications of certain slogans, but it may also contribute to fear or tension. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but could be interpreted as contributing to a negative portrayal of a group, potentially leading to harm. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on the negative aspects of the slogans without exploring underlying issues. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but does not foster constructive dialogue either.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.