JK Rowling

Rank 24 of 47
|
Score 30
12/14/2025, 1:56:14 PM
X
In reply to:
J.K. Rowling
@jk_rowling
·
50d
Kemp used at least one completely bogus quote in his ruling. It's also being suggested, per the Times, that he 'used AI to research other cases.'

But there's worse. Kemp misrepresents a Swedish study that looked at the pattern of criminality among trans-identified men.

2/4
J.K. Rowling
@jk_rowling
·
50d
This is plain disturbing.

Judge Alexander Kemp, who presided over the Sandie Peggie tribunal, 'has been urged... to withdraw his findings and consider his position after it emerged that his ruling was “riddled” with errors and inaccuracies.'

1/4
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/scot…

The statement critiques a judge's interpretation of a Swedish study on trans-identified men's criminality, suggesting a misreading of data. It engages in public discourse by addressing issues of legal interpretation, gender identity, and crime statistics.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to clarify a perceived misinterpretation, which could contribute to informed public understanding, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The critique respects privacy but challenges the judge's interpretation, which is a public matter, thus not violating privacy or dignity. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By attempting to correct a perceived error, the statement promotes understanding and accuracy, aligning with this principle. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of the judge's interpretation without resorting to personal attacks, adhering to this principle. [+1]