JK Rowling

Rank 25 of 47
|
Score 30
12/14/2025, 4:16:45 PM
X
In reply to:
Lexi
@oglex25
·
50d
@jk_rowling @MLPTheFirst @legaltweetz I’m sorry you had you share your personal medical history just to prove to these loonies that DSDs are a fluke (they still have a sex just with anatomical and genetic differences) and that there are two sexes.
J.K. Rowling
@jk_rowling
·
50d
@MLPTheFirst @legaltweetz I was born with a bleeding disorder. That doesn't make me a new variety of human. I don't feel 'less than' people without it, but nor does my bleeding disorder mean an inability to clot should be considered an innate attribute of the human species. I inherited an unusual physical
Mary Lane Porter
@MLPTheFirst
·
50d
@jk_rowling @legaltweetz It’s not a “mistake”, it’s a difference in biology, not “less than”. I also know those biological differences, and they don’t like that society is trying to force them in a box due to people trying to “stick it to trans”. Can’t we just support people as people and move on?
J.K. Rowling
@jk_rowling
·
50d
@MLPTheFirst @legaltweetz Nobody denies that there are biological variations. Nobody denies that there are people who may have ambiguous genitalia at birth, or possess small amounts of tissue more typically found in the opposite sex. Nobody has ever denied that nature makes mistakes. However, there is no
Mary Lane Porter
@MLPTheFirst
·
50d
@jk_rowling @legaltweetz My sister is an OBGYN in Fort Worth and has seen biological differences. Also, here is the National Inst of Health study on hermaphroditism https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/art…. It’s just not fair to put others in a box to make ourselves feel more comfortable.
J.K. Rowling
@jk_rowling
·
50d
@MLPTheFirst @legaltweetz People with DSDs are still provably either male or female (with bodies demonstrably organised to produce one gamete or the other, even if infertile) and many of them have a great dislike of being called 'intersex'. There are no human hermaphrodites. No human being has ever

The statement 'I don't care, it's not a state secret!' is part of a broader conversation about biological differences and societal perceptions, particularly in the context of sex and gender. The tone is dismissive and suggests a lack of concern for the privacy or sensitivity of the information being discussed. The intent seems to be to downplay the significance of sharing personal medical information in the public discourse about sex and gender.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it dismisses the potential sensitivity of sharing personal medical information, which could be harmful or disrespectful to those involved. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement violates the principle of respecting privacy and dignity, as it trivializes the sharing of personal medical history, which could be considered private information. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses the concerns of those who may feel their privacy is being compromised. [-1]