The statement suggests implementing post-tenure reviews to potentially terminate faculty perceived as having an agenda, based on concerns about academic influence on students' moral values. It reflects a critical stance on current academic practices and implies a need for accountability.
- The statement may cause harm by suggesting punitive measures against faculty based on perceived agendas, potentially stifling academic freedom. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It challenges the privacy and dignity of faculty by implying they have harmful agendas without specific evidence. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote constructive dialogue, as it generalizes and criticizes without engaging in a nuanced discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.