The statement critiques the nature of social media, suggesting it often amplifies anger and animosity, which can detract from constructive discourse. It implies a need for more balanced and less emotionally charged discussions on social media platforms.
- The statement does not directly harm but highlights the harm caused by rage bait on social media. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by pointing out the negative impact of rage bait, encouraging more empathetic discourse. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks and suggests a more constructive approach to discourse. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By critiquing social media's focus on animosity, it uses influence to advocate for better societal discourse. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by critiquing current trends and suggesting a more responsible use of platforms. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.