JK Rowling

The statement is part of a public discourse discussing a serious incident involving a person who caused harm and is now incarcerated. The tone is critical and somewhat sarcastic, suggesting that the person's family might be better off with him in prison. The intent seems to be to express relief or satisfaction that the individual is no longer a threat, but it also implies a judgment on the individual's character and impact on his family.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it makes a sarcastic remark about the individual's family potentially having a better Christmas without him, which could be hurtful. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of the individual or his family, as it publicly speculates on their personal feelings and situation. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it lacks sensitivity towards the family's situation and the individual's circumstances. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes a personal judgment rather than discussing the broader issues or context. [-1]