In reply to:
Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley
@RepPressley
·
9d
The statement and accompanying images engage in public discourse by addressing the issue of presidential pardons and their implications on justice and political favoritism. The tone is critical, aiming to highlight perceived misuse of clemency powers by a political figure.
- The statement aims to highlight perceived injustices, which aligns with striving to do no harm by advocating for those affected by mass incarceration. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but could be seen as critical of a public figure, which is generally acceptable in public discourse. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of the issue by providing data and a report, fostering informed discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of a political figure's actions, which is constructive in nature and not a personal attack. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.