The statement critiques the use of presidential pardons, highlighting that a significant portion of women pardoned had obstructed access to reproductive healthcare. It is part of a broader discussion on the use of clemency, suggesting it favored certain groups over addressing systemic issues.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement aims to highlight perceived injustices in the use of pardons, potentially promoting harm reduction by advocating for fairer clemency practices.
[+1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.It seeks to promote understanding and empathy by drawing attention to the impact of pardons on marginalized groups.
[+1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in criticism of a public figure's actions, focusing on policy rather than personal attacks.
[+1]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.It uses the platform to advocate for societal betterment by addressing issues of justice and equity.
[+1]