Reposted by Matt Taibbi
The statement expresses concern over the EU's sanctioning of Jacques Baud for his views on the Ukraine war, suggesting a threat to free speech and implying potential consequences for others. The tone is alarmist and critical of the EU's actions.
- The statement uses strong language that could incite fear, potentially causing harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but could be seen as engaging in a form of public criticism that borders on harassment of the EU's actions.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead uses a confrontational tone. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- It attempts to use influence to raise awareness about perceived threats to free speech. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement raises concerns about free speech, aligning with the principle but does so in a manner that could be seen as alarmist. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.