In reply to:
Dr. Dame Katy Denise CH GBE 🏳️⚧️🇳🇬🪑
@damekatydenise_
·
46d
The statement engages in a public discourse involving a critique of a public figure's actions, using sarcasm and humor. It questions the sincerity of a gesture and implies a lack of respect for a marginalized group. The tone is confrontational and accusatory.
- The statement uses sarcasm and potentially harmful language, which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement could be seen as disrespectful and potentially harassing, violating the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses accusatory language. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in personal attacks rather than constructive criticism. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.