The statement suggests that outperforming a well-known investor like Warren Buffett is statistically impossible without insider information, implying unethical or illegal activity. This touches on public discourse as it raises concerns about potential insider trading by a public figure.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement implies wrongdoing without evidence, potentially causing harm to reputations.
 [-2]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.It does not respect privacy or dignity, as it accuses someone of unethical behavior without proof.
 [-2]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not promote constructive dialogue, as it makes an accusation rather than engaging in a reasoned discussion.
 [-1]