Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is a critique of U.S. foreign policy, specifically regarding intervention in Venezuela. It questions the effectiveness of past interventions in other countries and suggests that the motivation is related to oil and regime change. The tone is critical and challenges the actions of previous administrations.
- The statement aims to critique policy decisions, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by questioning potentially harmful actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by encouraging reflection on past interventions and their outcomes. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of foreign policy without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.