Mike Johnson

Rank 31 of 47
|
Score -7
12/18/2025, 7:30:27 PM
X
In reply to:
Speaker Mike Johnson
@SpeakerJohnson
·
13d
The Obamacare is unaffordable in large part because it is RIDDLED with waste, fraud, and abuse.
 
• 6.4 MILLION ineligible enrollments
• $27 BILLION wasted
• $35 BILLION paid for plans with zero medical claims
 
It’s all broken — and taxpayers are paying the price.
Speaker Mike Johnson
@SpeakerJohnson
·
13d
Actual care has continued to deteriorate. The “high-quality” health care Americans were promised never happened.

By the end of last year, approval of U.S. health care quality fell to its LOWEST level in 24 years.
Speaker Mike Johnson
@SpeakerJohnson
·
13d
Your costs have SKYROCKETED since the Unaffordable Care Act was enacted.
 
Starting in 2014, premiums have risen nearly TWICE as fast as employer coverage and more than THREE TIMES faster than inflation.
Speaker Mike Johnson
@SpeakerJohnson
·
13d
🧵Fifteen years ago, Democrats promised the American people that Obamacare, aka the Unaffordable Care Act, would lower costs, improve care, and let patients keep their doctors.
 
It was a LIE.

Now we know, the truth: that Americans are worse off, and the Unaffordable Care Act

The statement critiques the impact of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), claiming it led to loss of access to trusted doctors and narrow networks, contradicting initial promises. It uses strong language to emphasize perceived failures and includes an image from PolitiFact labeling a related promise as the 'Lie of the Year.'

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm by spreading distrust without offering solutions. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks but criticizes a political party's actions, which is within the bounds of public discourse.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not promote constructive dialogue or offer solutions, focusing instead on criticism. [-1]