Mike Johnson

Rank 31 of 47
|
Score -7
12/18/2025, 7:30:27 PM
X
In reply to:
Speaker Mike Johnson
@SpeakerJohnson
·
13d
MILLIONS of Americans were cut off from their trusted doctors – despite being told by Democrats that they could keep their doctors. 
 
Access to trusted doctors was lost, and narrow networks became the norm — leaving patients insured on paper, but actually cut off from care.
Speaker Mike Johnson
@SpeakerJohnson
·
13d
The Obamacare is unaffordable in large part because it is RIDDLED with waste, fraud, and abuse.
 
• 6.4 MILLION ineligible enrollments
• $27 BILLION wasted
• $35 BILLION paid for plans with zero medical claims
 
It’s all broken — and taxpayers are paying the price.
Speaker Mike Johnson
@SpeakerJohnson
·
13d
Actual care has continued to deteriorate. The “high-quality” health care Americans were promised never happened.

By the end of last year, approval of U.S. health care quality fell to its LOWEST level in 24 years.
Speaker Mike Johnson
@SpeakerJohnson
·
13d
Your costs have SKYROCKETED since the Unaffordable Care Act was enacted.
 
Starting in 2014, premiums have risen nearly TWICE as fast as employer coverage and more than THREE TIMES faster than inflation.
Speaker Mike Johnson
@SpeakerJohnson
·
13d
🧵Fifteen years ago, Democrats promised the American people that Obamacare, aka the Unaffordable Care Act, would lower costs, improve care, and let patients keep their doctors.
 
It was a LIE.

Now we know, the truth: that Americans are worse off, and the Unaffordable Care Act

The statement criticizes Democrats for extending COVID-era benefits to health insurance companies without addressing fraud, suggesting this increases costs and reduces coverage quality. The tone is accusatory and politically charged, focusing on alleged failures of the Democratic party regarding healthcare policies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or divisive, potentially violating the principle of striving to do no harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it attributes blame to a specific political group without acknowledging complexities. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, instead opting for a confrontational tone that may hinder understanding. [-1]