The statement calls for the abolition of the diversity visa lottery, linking it to a criminal case, and is part of a public discussion on immigration policy.
- The statement could be seen as doing harm by associating a criminal act with a specific immigration program, potentially stigmatizing its beneficiaries. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of individuals who benefit from the diversity visa program, as it generalizes based on a single incident. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on a negative incident without acknowledging the broader context or benefits of the program. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it dismisses the program without considering counterarguments or engaging with differing perspectives. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible, as it could incite negative perceptions of a specific group. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.