Reposted by Ron DeSantis
The statement calls for the abolition of the diversity visa lottery, linking it to a criminal act by an individual who entered the country through this program. The tone is critical and suggests a policy change based on a specific incident.
- The statement could be seen as doing harm by generalizing a criminal act to an entire visa program, potentially stigmatizing its beneficiaries. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of individuals who benefit from the diversity visa program, as it associates them with criminal behavior without evidence of a broader trend. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks empathy and understanding, as it does not consider the positive contributions of diversity visa recipients. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or provide a balanced view of the diversity visa program, instead focusing on a negative incident. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a policy change, but it does so in a way that may not contribute positively to societal understanding or cohesion. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but may not do so responsibly, as it could incite negative perceptions of a specific group. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.