The statement critiques the practice of spreading misinformation for personal gain, specifically targeting individuals who may have profited from sensationalism or 'rage bait.' It references a conversation about misinformation affecting a serious public issue, namely a shooting investigation. The tone is accusatory and critical, suggesting a need for accountability in public discourse.
- The statement indirectly addresses the harm caused by misinformation, suggesting a violation of this principle by those spreading it. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in direct harassment or hate speech, though it is critical of certain behaviors.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is accusatory and lacks constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not do so constructively, as it includes a personal attack by labeling actions as 'rage bait and bs.' [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement calls for corrections, aligning with the principle of acknowledging and correcting mistakes. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses influence to highlight issues of misinformation, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by critiquing misinformation but could use a more responsible tone.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.