The statement critiques Harvard's historical presidential rankings, suggesting ideological bias. It argues that Woodrow Wilson's high ranking is undeserved due to his rejection of foundational constitutional principles, while Calvin Coolidge is underrated. The tone is critical and suggests a long-standing bias in academic evaluations.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not directly harm but critiques an institution's perceived bias.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.It does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on criticism.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue or evidence to support claims.
[-1]