TheCriticalThinker
@WodFitRunner
·
1d
The statement questions the assumption that members of Congress do not leak sensitive information, implying that such actions are common. It engages in public discourse by addressing concerns about transparency and accountability in government.
- The statement could be seen as harmful by suggesting unethical behavior is common, potentially eroding trust in public institutions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the privacy or dignity of members of Congress by implying they regularly engage in unethical behavior without evidence. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it assumes negative actions without constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it makes a broad assumption without specific evidence or dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.