Matt Taibbi

Rank 35 of 47

Score -49

There’s a huge difference between committing an overt act that helps “a person” (a specific person) escape capture, and generally reporting what you see. One can be crime, the other is speech.

TomGrady

@TomGrady07

20d

@PromoHack @mtaibbi We’re not debating here Mark, you have an opinion, I’m telling you what the law says.

You can feel however you want to, the law is clear.

12/22/2025, 3:16:33 PM

The statement engages in a discussion about the legal distinctions between speech and actions that may constitute a crime, specifically in the context of aiding someone to escape capture. It is part of a broader conversation about legal interpretations and free speech, which are public issues.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it is a legal clarification rather than an attack or harmful rhetoric.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in a legal clarification rather than a personal attack, maintaining a focus on the legal distinction rather than the individuals involved. [+1]
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
The statement upholds the principle of free speech by discussing the legal boundaries of speech and action, contributing to a nuanced understanding of the issue. [+1]