Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement refers to a new class of warships named 'Trump-class' battleships, which is part of a broader discussion about military developments and the president's vision for a 'Golden Fleet.' This constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues related to national security and defense policy.
- The statement itself does not directly cause harm, but the naming of military assets after political figures can be polarizing.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is a factual update without additional context.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, as it is a straightforward announcement. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to inform the public about military developments, which can be seen as contributing to public awareness. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to responsibly inform the public about a significant policy decision. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.