The statement and images involve a discussion on the impact of gender-affirming care for transgender youth, highlighting a discrepancy between public statements and court testimony. The press release emphasizes the necessity of such care for survival, while the court testimony acknowledges a lack of evidence for reducing completed suicides. This raises questions about the consistency and accuracy of public claims.
- The statement in the press release may exaggerate the necessity of procedures without clear evidence, potentially causing harm by spreading misinformation. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The discrepancy between public and court statements could undermine trust and respect for privacy and dignity, as it suggests possible manipulation of information. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The inconsistency between statements may hinder constructive dialogue, as it could be perceived as misleading or disingenuous. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.