Elon Musk

Rank 37 of 47
|
Score -74
12/23/2025, 4:23:07 PM
X
In reply to:
Mojo Resin
@MojoResin
路
40d
@elonmusk @threelinestudio Yes.
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
路
40d
@threelinestudio Once again reinforcing the point that balls-deep, woke White women are the doom of Western civilization
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
路
40d
@threelinestudio The Atlantic is a fake publication kept alive only by Laurene Jobs using her dead husband鈥檚 money for something he would despise
Robert J. Kuntz
@threelinestudio
路
41d
Hey @elonmusk I am the last surviving member from the original D&D design team and Gary Gygax's student. I will gladly help rebut this POS article If someone can forward me a photo-copy of it. It would be my pleasure.
The Dungeon Crawler
@thedungeoncraw3
路
41d
FFS I thought the D&D activists were getting bored and went looking for something else to ruin. But we鈥檝e got a late headline of the year here.

The statement and image engage in public discourse by addressing issues of race, media, and societal dynamics. The meme implies that 'white liberals' silence 'blacks with differing opinions,' which is a critique of perceived racial and political dynamics. The tone is mocking and dismissive, using humor to convey a controversial point.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement may cause harm by perpetuating stereotypes and racial tensions, violating the principle of doing no harm.聽[-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It disrespects the dignity of individuals by using a meme that simplifies complex racial dynamics, potentially engaging in cyberbullying or hate speech.聽[-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses humor to mock rather than foster dialogue.聽[-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and instead uses a personal attack on a group, failing to promote constructive dialogue.聽[-2]