The statement suggests making judges personally liable for crimes committed by individuals they release, implying this would deter such releases. It addresses public safety and judicial accountability, engaging in public discourse.
- The statement could be seen as harmful by suggesting punitive measures against judges, potentially undermining judicial independence. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the dignity of judges by proposing personal liability, which could be seen as a form of harassment. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote constructive dialogue, as it suggests a punitive approach rather than a balanced discussion on judicial reform. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.