In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
39d
The statement criticizes '60 Minutes' as a propaganda machine and suggests that Bari Weiss should take significant action to address the perceived issues. It engages in public discourse by discussing media ethics and credibility, which are public concerns.
- The statement uses strong language ('propaganda machine') which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the strong language could be seen as disrespectful to the individuals involved. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for a dismissive tone without providing specific evidence or engaging with the opposing viewpoint. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity due to its accusatory tone without substantiation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.