Jill Stien

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -82

The statement criticizes Tulsi Gabbard for allegedly engaging in Islamophobia and aligning with Trump, while also referencing her previous stance on Iran's nuclear capabilities. The tone is accusatory and critical, aiming to highlight perceived hypocrisy and dangerous rhetoric.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful, reducing its adherence to the principle of doing no harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It accuses Gabbard of Islamophobia, which could be seen as a violation of respecting privacy and dignity, though it addresses a public figure's actions. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement attempts to promote understanding by calling out Islamophobia, but the accusatory tone may undermine this effort.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in personal attacks rather than constructive criticism, violating this principle. [-2]