In reply to:
Seamus (FreedomToons)
@seamus_coughlin
·
37d
The statement and conversation involve public discourse as they address issues of crime, justice, and the role of the judiciary. The initial comment suggests a shift in focus from punishing criminals to holding judges accountable, implying dissatisfaction with the judicial system. The reply 'Seriously' indicates agreement or emphasis on the previous statement.
- The statement expresses frustration with the justice system but does not directly incite harm.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of judges, suggesting punitive measures against them without constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks constructive criticism and instead uses hyperbole, which could hinder productive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.