In reply to:
Mike Benz
@MikeBenzCyber
·
36d
Under Secretary of State Sarah B. Rogers
@UnderSecPD
·
36d
The statement and image engage in public discourse by discussing issues related to censorship, international relations, and policy actions. The tone is provocative and critical, suggesting a conspiracy to undermine a social media platform and highlighting visa sanctions as a response to perceived censorship activities.
- The statement uses inflammatory language ('kill X') which could be seen as harmful and escalates tensions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement and image may violate privacy and dignity by targeting specific individuals and organizations without clear evidence. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead it seems to mock and provoke. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement lacks constructive criticism and engages in personal attacks, reducing the potential for meaningful dialogue. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.