cara stlouis
@caraworks711
·
8d
The statement and linked content engage in public discourse by discussing the credibility of a public figure's theories. The tone is dismissive and critical, focusing on the lack of evidence for the theories. The conversation includes personal attacks and sarcasm, which detracts from constructive dialogue.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it includes dismissive language and personal attacks. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, engaging in derogatory remarks. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on criticism without constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, relying on personal attacks rather than substantive discussion. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.