In reply to:
OfByFor
@OfByForEveR
·
7d
The conversation involves a discussion about conspiracy theories and the responsibility of sharing unverified information. It touches on public discourse by addressing the spread of potentially harmful narratives without evidence.
- The statement by @mtaibbi highlights the harm of spreading unverified accusations, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The conversation respects privacy but involves criticism of public figures, which is generally acceptable in public discourse.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The dialogue attempts to promote understanding by questioning the validity of unverified claims. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The exchange involves constructive criticism of spreading unverified theories, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.