The statement is a provocative critique of EU technocrats, suggesting they prioritize censorship over responding to significant tragedies like the Bataclan Massacre. It engages in public discourse by addressing issues of censorship and governance within the EU.
- The statement uses a provocative comparison that could be seen as harmful or insensitive, particularly to those affected by the Bataclan Massacre. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it could be seen as disrespectful to the victims of the Bataclan Massacre. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for a hyperbolic comparison that could be seen as a personal attack on EU technocrats. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be considered responsible or with integrity, given the sensitive nature of the comparison. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.