Jill Stien

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -82

The statement criticizes a U.S. policy decision, describing it as a 'criminal naval blockade' and an attempt to 'provoke regime change' in Venezuela. It uses strong language, such as 'piracy' and 'stealing,' to convey disapproval of the actions attributed to the Trump administration.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses charged language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks but uses strong language that could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on criticism. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, opting for strong criticism instead. [-1]