The statement engages in a discussion about journalistic integrity and the verification of information before publication, referencing historical examples like Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers. It critiques the approach of a modern journalist or public figure in handling sensitive information, suggesting a lack of thorough verification compared to past standards.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it critiques the actions of another, which could be seen as indirectly harmful if not done constructively.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in personal attacks or hate speech, though it does critique professional actions.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, focusing instead on critique. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by comparing current actions to historical standards, though it could be more constructive by offering solutions.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by engaging in a public debate about journalistic practices, using the platform to discuss important issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.