In reply to:
Robert Scoble
@Scobleizer
·
21d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the implications of The Boring Company's tunnel projects and Tesla's potential market dominance. It suggests that while The Boring Company is open to collaboration, other companies are not attempting similar projects.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a competitive advantage, which could be seen as dismissive of other companies' efforts.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement lacks empathy and understanding towards other companies, implying they are not trying. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or address the concerns raised about monopolistic practices. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.