In reply to:
The statement is a response to a controversial topic regarding the banning of cousin marriage and its potential racial implications. The reply, consisting of question marks, suggests confusion or a request for clarification. It does not provide substantive engagement or contribute to the discussion.
- The statement does not cause harm but lacks constructive input.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not promote understanding or empathy, as it only questions the previous statement without elaboration.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or criticism.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.