The statement 'Tim Walz is a crook' is accusatory and lacks evidence or context. It is part of a broader conversation criticizing a welfare program. The tone is inflammatory and could be seen as a personal attack.
- The statement could cause harm by making unsubstantiated claims about an individual. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the dignity of the person it accuses, potentially engaging in defamation. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote constructive dialogue and instead resorts to a personal attack. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.