In reply to:
Bill Ackman
@BillAckman
·
9h
The statement is a supportive reply to a conversation about alleged fraud involving Minnesota politicians. It does not add substantive content to the discussion but endorses the previous critical statements.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but supports a potentially harmful accusation without evidence. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect privacy or dignity, as it endorses accusations against public figures without additional context. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks empathy or compassion, as it does not consider the perspectives of those accused. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it merely agrees with a critical stance without further discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.