The statement engages in a discussion about journalistic integrity and the nature of compensation for journalists, which is a public issue. The tone is defensive, aiming to clarify the nature of the Twitter Files publication. It suggests that the journalists involved were not financially motivated, contrasting with typical journalistic practices.
- The statement does not directly harm others but is part of a contentious debate.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but engages in a public dispute, which can border on harassment. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding of the journalist's perspective. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a defensive dialogue rather than constructive criticism. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.