Matt Taibbi

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 18
12/29/2025, 2:55:05 PM
X
In reply to:
Jon
@Jon8x
·
11h
@mtaibbi Why are you putting the word “convicted” in quotes when it’s not in the tweet you’re responding to?

Seems dishonest and basically defeats the whole purpose of the tweet? People are allowed to find the evidence clear and convincing, even if Epstein wasn’t convicted?
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
11h
You can say that all you want, and it may ultimately be true that Epstein was a sex trafficker. But he’s not a “convicted” sex trafficker and at this point never will be.
I know people don’t care about these distinctions, but if it’s okay to do here, it will happen elsewhere.
Robed Pierre
@JackParsonsLive
·
11h
In this Tweet, Taibbi loses all credibility himself.

There is clear and convincing evidence in the public record that Epstein was a child r*pist who trafficked children for a transnational kompromat operation.

That operation is connected to more than one Intelligence Agency.

The statement is part of a public discourse on the importance of accuracy in journalism, particularly in the context of discussing Jeffrey Epstein's criminal activities. The conversation revolves around the use of the term 'convicted' in relation to Epstein, highlighting the significance of precise language in media reporting.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm directly but emphasizes the importance of accuracy, which indirectly supports harm reduction by promoting truthful reporting. [+1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the misuse of the term 'convicted' and does not resort to personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and responsible use of a platform by advocating for accurate journalism. [+2]