The statement is part of a broader conversation about the role of government agencies and social media platforms in information control and censorship, which is a public issue. The tone is defensive and challenges the notion that criticism is only directed at one political side. The intent is to question the consistency of criticism across political lines.
- The statement does not directly harm others but is part of a contentious debate.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the broader conversation includes some dismissive language.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is more focused on defending a position. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in dialogue but does not resort to personal attacks, though the broader conversation includes some dismissive remarks.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.